The main problem
with questions like this one is their, on the one hand, ambiguity and, on the
other hand, relentlessness with which those who ask them require to be answered.
What kind of decisions? About what? If we
think along the lines presupposed by the question, we should define the unified age when teenagers should be let to both choose
what they would have for breakfast and whom to marry.
The point of view
behind this question kind of presupposes that until certain
age children and teenagers are like small kids who shouldn’t be let to do
anything on their own, and afterwards immediately become responsible members of the society one may and has to
trust.
What I think is
that this approach to the problem is incorrect in the very least. People are different, children are different, circumstances are
different. One person needs to be overseen all the time lest he does something
stupid, another may be his own master at the age of ten and
manage to do it really well.
In my opinion, both
extremes are equally bad. When a teenager is left completely on his own, it may
result not only in some personal problems – he may bring problems to his parents as well. But when he is under constant
surveillance, this interferes him being an individual, as well as breeds
rebellion and hatred towards his parents, which is hardly what they want to achieve.
Reasonable approach
is…
Comments
Post a Comment